Subject	Revised Spreadsheet
Posted by	Spectrum (WI) on January 11, 2007 at 10:22 PM
	This message has been viewed 57 times.
In Reply To	I've offered many times to adapt a stronger trans >>> posted by LitlElvis on January 11, 2007 at 01:04 PM
Message	I hope this is what you wanted to see. The richmond looks really attractive when coupled with stock tt gears. I guess you could put that $1K plus for the 4.10's twords the tranny. I used the gear ratios as follows for each series: Stock = 3.214, 1.925, 1.302, 1.000, 0.752 Richmond = 3.280, 2.130, 1.570, 1.240, 1.000, 0.760 Tremec = 2.970, 2.070, 1.430, 1.000, 0.800, 0.620 TT diff = 3.69 Richmond diff = 4.10
Follow Ups	Playing with excel, 5 & 6 spd trans comparisons - Spectrum (WI) 20:22:36 01/10/07 what's PRM?... :) (n/m) - turbomaniac 20:26:33 01/10/07 Splling not my speshilty (n/m) - Spectrum (WI) 20:27:28 01/10/07 Yep - collegeboy 20:27:44 01/10/07 How is that Craft Square Buy going? (n/m) - Spectrum (WI) 20:30:25 01/10/07 still no reply - collegeboy 20:40:48 01/10/07 so basically, an extra 6th gear. (n/m) - Guapo 20:37:20 01/10/07 i wish i had one. think i will swap out to a 3.X r200 - Halo Z 20:51:38 01/10/07 lol, for real (n/m) - boss balla 03:50:03 01/11/07 Diddo, specially with NA rear end or leader gears - SpecNATT (Houston) 19:36:31 01/11/07 I have been looking at that one too for that reason - Ballistic 21:31:14 01/10/07 What is an R200? (n/m) - Spectrum (WI) 21:38:32 01/10/07 n/a Z32 diff (n/m) - 92naz32 21:43:42 01/10/07 Does Tremec make the 98+ spec manual tranny? (n/m) - aquariuscsm 21:40:53 01/10/07 I've offered many times to adapt a stronger trans >>> - LitlElvis 13:04:52 01/11/07 Revised Spreadsheet - Spectrum (WI) 22:22:27 01/11/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.